» Notable Cases of McKenney & Froelich
» Notable Cases
» Q&A With Jerry Froelich
» The Bill Campbell Trial
» Tokars attorney takes the stand himself
» Campbell Lawyer: Corruption not mayor’s fault


  Tokars attorney takes stand himself Rare tactic used to rebut witness

Reprinted from The Atlanta Journal Constitution Wednesday, March 12, 1997

LaFayette – The murder trial of former Atlanta prosecutor Fred Tokars was rocked Tuesday by the surprising testimony of a defense attorney who said he was compelled to testify after prosecutors misrepresented Tokars’ federal conviction.

Jerry Froelich testified that he also wanted to set the record straight about the prison sentence of star witness Eddie Lawrence. While Tokars will “die in prison,” Froelich said, “Lawrence will not spend a day in prison. He’s in the federal witness protection program, and the U.S. Marshal’s Service is not going to allow him in state prison.”

Froelich, who unsuccessfully defended Tokars in federal court, said that in exchange for testifying against Tokars, Lawrence received a 12-year federal prison sentence he is serving concurrently with a state life sentence for his role in arranging Sara Tokar’s murder.

But Cobb County District Attorney Tom Charron challenged Froelich’s characterization of the plea bargain, saying that the U.S. Marshals have been told that Lawrence should be transferred to state custody when he finishes his federal sentence.

Tokars received multiple life terms without parole on federal convictions for money laundering and racketeering.

Froelich downplayed Tokars’ appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court receives 15,000 or 20,000 appeals a year,” Froelich said. “I think they rule on about 100.”

Former U.S. Attorney Joe Whitely said Froelich’s decision to testify was “unique in my experience.” In coming to the witness stand, the defense attorney could have been forced to reveal client confidences, Whitley said.

Froelich said he felt compelled to testify after Charron read the federal indictment describing interstate cocaine trafficking, money laundering, torture and murder to the jury. “They read parts of the indictment that were not related to Fred Tokars,” Froelich said. “There’s no way I could stand by, allowing such misleading testimony to go in.”

Froelich said charges in the indictment that did not pertain to Tokars included allegations that Atlanta police cadet Michael Jones was tortured by drug dealers associated with Tokars; a $40,000 Lexus was purchased with drug money that he said Tokars knew nothing about; and money laundering through several night clubs that he said occurred long before Tokars met the other defendants.

Whitley said Charron can blunt Froelich’s ploy and other attacks on Lawrence’s credibility by appealing to jurors to make their decision on the case before the. “Tom Charron could tell jurors they have a separate sovereign obligation under Georgia law to consider this case in isolation from what might have happened in another jurisdiction,” Whitley said. “No one can ascertain what may happen in the federal case.”


Website design and development by 614DESIGNS.com